I was researching a write-up by Rick Quinn at the absolute most excellent blog "Seeking Alpha", whereby he installed a fiscally careful response to the clear profligate spending associated with international adventurism initiated by the neo-cons in the Bush Administration. Jim's report motivated the next thoughts.
The methods of prospect price, and threat centered power framework seem international to a lot of people. The current DoD plan of "functions based" force design is also easily co-opted in to an open checkbook for endless scientific solutions for mythic possible enemies, specially if it were linked with a tacit agreement to account DoD at a set % of GDP as amazingly argued by our recent Chairman of the Shared Chiefs. You are able to hear the hogs of war drooling around that.
the comments in the Quinn article are rich reasons for qualified discussions for citizens interested in their foreign policy and the utilization of the military and reflection a lot of what i hear in the classroom. Nearly all the fallacies of logic and purpose are displayed there in the remarks block. I was pleased to see Quinn quoting one of my characters Brian Walker, among the several adult followers on the subject of our fiscal madness.
I comparison Quinn's comments in what passes for smart discussion of America's military role in the world, the task of Thomas Barnett, an easy talking, appealing and effective modern rational, and I weep for my country
산업단지분양
I recommend the guide "Military Reform" by Winslow Wheeler and Lawrence Korb, Wayne Fallows' "National Defense", and Robert Coram's "Boyd", the biography of COL John Boyd. The documentary "Why We Fight" I think does a responsible job of putting out the second and 3d purchase effects of policy possibilities built without a clear grasp of longterm strategy. It also recommendations Ike in the starting moments. It can be very recommended.
We're all stakeholders in this dysfunction offense response process and we ought to learn to separate the existing structural cycle. The pattern is: offense, charge, confidence, incarceration, release and recidivism (CACIRR) I won't bore you with the statistics. Some of the figures you know. In reality, lots of you are the data, because we're all stakeholders in this unpleasant, also traumatic symbiosis of crime, arrest, confidence, incarceration, discharge and recidivism.
You need to be a member of On Feet Nation to add comments!
Join On Feet Nation