Furthermore, the language and framework of ACIM in many cases are criticized for being overly complicated and esoteric. The course's dense and repeated prose may be demanding to understand and understand, ultimately causing confusion and misinterpretation among readers. That complexity can create a buffer to access, which makes it hard for people to completely interact with and take advantage of the course. Some authorities disagree that the complicated language is just a strategic technique to unknown the lack of substantive content and to produce an illusion of profundity. The issue in comprehending the substance also can lead to a dependence on external educators and interpreters, more perpetuating the commercialization and possibility of exploitation within the ACIM community.

Additionally, the thought of forgiveness as shown in ACIM has been criticized for being excessively basic and potentially dismissive of true hurt and injustice. The class advocates for an application of forgiveness that requires realizing the illusory nature of the perceived offense and letting get of grievances. While this approach may be beneficial in promoting internal peace and acim app reducing particular suffering, it may not acceptably handle the difficulties of particular circumstances, such as abuse or endemic injustice. Authorities fight that this kind of forgiveness can be seen as minimizing the activities of victims and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This can result in an application of spiritual skipping, wherever people use spiritual ideas to prevent dealing with uncomfortable emotions and difficult realities.

The entire worldview shown by ACIM, which emphasizes the illusory character of the material earth and the ego, can also be problematic. This perception can lead to an application of spiritual escapism, wherever individuals disengage from the physical earth and their difficulties in favor of an idealized spiritual reality. While this might give short-term comfort or a feeling of transcendence, additionally, it may cause a lack of involvement with important facets of life, such as for instance relationships, responsibilities, and social issues. Critics argue that disengagement may be detrimental to both the in-patient and culture, since it promotes an application of passivity and neglect of real-world problems.

The exclusivity of ACIM is another level of contention. The course usually occurs as an exceptional spiritual journey, implying that different spiritual or religious traditions are less legitimate or effective. That exclusivity can foster a feeling of religious elitism among adherents and create team as opposed to unity. In addition, it restricts the possibility of persons to draw on a diverse array of spiritual assets and traditions within their particular growth and healing. Authorities argue that the more inclusive and integrative method of spirituality could be more helpful and less divisive.