The practical application of ACIM's teachings is also a spot of contention. Although some people report positive transformations and particular growth from after the course, the others find the methods to be ineffective as well as harmful. The course's emphasis on forgiveness and love is remarkable, but critics argue that it can be excessively simplified and naïve, failing to handle the complexities of human relationships and the necessity for boundaries and accountability. Additionally, the course's size and intense character could be frustrating for some individuals, leading to burnout or disillusionment. Authorities suggest that the full time and work required to accomplish ACIM could be greater used on more empirically reinforced beneficial methods or spiritual disciplines that have a proven track record of effectiveness.

The broader influence of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help communities can also be worth considering. The program has encouraged a significant subsequent and has been incorporated into various New Age and david hoffmeister acim religious movements. But, their influence is visible as a double-edged sword. Using one give, it has presented a construction for individuals seeking religious development and inner peace. On one other hand, their teachings may donate to a tradition of religious skipping, wherever persons use religious ideas to prevent dealing with particular and cultural issues. This will cause a questionnaire of escapism, where the focus on spiritual values distracts from the prerequisite of engaging with and handling real-world challenges.

More over, the industrial achievement of ACIM and their related products increases honest concerns. The growth of workshops, publications, and seminars predicated on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious wants and vulnerabilities. Experts argue that the commercialization of spirituality can lead to the exploitation of seekers, who might invest significant time and income in to methods that ultimately don't supply on their promises. That commercialization may also donate to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different interpretations and changes proliferate, probably ultimately causing distress and misapplication of the principles.

Still another critical part to consider could be the exclusivity and dogmatism that could occasionally accompany the ACIM community. While the course itself advances general enjoy and forgiveness, the way it's shown and practiced by some adherents can lead to an expression of religious elitism. This could produce an "us versus them" mentality, wherever people who follow ACIM are viewed as enlightened, while those who don't are considered as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes may be divisive and counterproductive to the course's proposed objectives of peace and unity. Authorities fight that true spiritual development must foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to making a hierarchical difference involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.