The broader influence of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help neighborhoods can be price considering. The program has inspired a substantial subsequent and has been incorporated into different New Age and religious movements. Nevertheless, its effect is visible as a double-edged sword. Using one hand, it has offered a platform for people seeking religious growth and inner peace. On another hand, its teachings may donate to a lifestyle of religious skipping, where people use spiritual ideas to avoid dealing with personal and cultural issues. This can lead to an application of escapism, where the give attention to religious values distracts from the requisite of interesting with and addressing real-world challenges.

More over, the commercial success of ACIM and its connected products improves moral concerns. The growth of workshops, publications, and seminars based on ACIM is visible as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Experts fight that the commercialization of spirituality may cause the christ the exploitation of seekers, who might spend substantial time and money into methods that fundamentally do not produce on their promises. That commercialization can also contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous interpretations and changes proliferate, perhaps leading to confusion and misapplication of the principles.

Another important aspect to think about could be the exclusivity and dogmatism that will sometimes accompany the ACIM community. As the class it self stimulates universal love and forgiveness, just how it is shown and used by some adherents may result in a sense of spiritual elitism. This may create an "us versus them" mindset, wherever those who follow ACIM are seen as enlightened, while those that do not are seen as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and counterproductive to the course's supposed targets of peace and unity. Experts disagree that correct religious development should foster inclusivity and humility, rather than creating a hierarchical difference involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.

The issue of whether ACIM is "true" ultimately depends on one's criteria for truth. From the scientific perception, having less empirical evidence encouraging the claims of divine dictation and the course's metaphysical assertions may be reasons for skepticism. From the philosophical perspective, the inner inconsistencies and syncretism of ACIM can result in questions about its coherence and plausible validity. From a psychological perception, the potential for cognitive dissonance and psychological stress raises issues in regards to the course's affect emotional health. And from a functional standpoint, the mixed results reported by practitioners and the potential for commercialization and exploitation claim that ACIM's efficiency and moral ranking are questionable.