The realistic application of ACIM's teachings can also be a place of contention. While some individuals record positive transformations and personal growth from following class, others get the practices to be inadequate or even harmful. The course's emphasis on forgiveness and love is excellent, but authorities disagree that it can be overly easy and naïve, declining to handle the complexities of human relationships and the need for limits and accountability. Furthermore, the course's size and extensive nature may be overwhelming for some individuals, resulting in burnout or disillusionment. Critics suggest that enough time and effort expected to accomplish ACIM could be greater used on more empirically supported healing practices or spiritual disciplines that have a proven track record of effectiveness.

The broader affect of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help communities can be worth david hoffmeister considering. The course has influenced a substantial subsequent and has been built-into different New Era and religious movements. But, its influence can be seen as a double-edged sword. On one hand, it's presented a platform for people seeking spiritual growth and inner peace. On one other give, its teachings may subscribe to a culture of religious bypassing, wherever individuals use spiritual ideas to prevent coping with particular and social issues. This could result in an application of escapism, where the concentrate on religious attitudes distracts from the requisite of participating with and handling real-world challenges.

More over, the commercial achievement of ACIM and its related materials increases ethical concerns. The proliferation of workshops, books, and seminars based on ACIM is visible as capitalizing on individuals' religious wants and vulnerabilities. Critics disagree that the commercialization of spirituality can result in the exploitation of seekers, who may invest significant time and income in to techniques that fundamentally don't produce on their promises. That commercialization also can contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous understandings and changes proliferate, probably leading to frustration and misapplication of the principles.

Yet another critical part to think about is the exclusivity and dogmatism that may occasionally accompany the ACIM community. As the class itself promotes universal love and forgiveness, just how it's taught and practiced by some adherents can result in a sense of spiritual elitism. This will develop an "us versus them" attitude, wherever people who follow ACIM are regarded as enlightened, while those who do not are considered as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes may be divisive and detrimental to the course's proposed targets of peace and unity. Experts argue that true religious growth should foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to making a hierarchical difference between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.