The useful program of ACIM's teachings can be a point of contention. While some individuals record good transformations and particular development from after the program, the others get the methods to be inadequate as well as harmful. The course's emphasis on forgiveness and enjoy is exceptional, but critics disagree that it could be excessively basic and naïve, declining to deal with the difficulties of individual associations and the requirement for boundaries and accountability. Furthermore, the course's size and intense character may be overwhelming for a lot of people, resulting in burnout or disillusionment. Critics declare that enough time and effort needed to perform ACIM could possibly be greater spent on more empirically supported beneficial techniques or religious disciplines which have a proven history of effectiveness.

The broader affect of ACIM on the religious and self-help communities can also be worth considering. The program has influenced a substantial david hoffmeister subsequent and has been incorporated into numerous New Age and religious movements. However, their effect is visible as a double-edged sword. Using one hand, it has offered a platform for individuals seeking spiritual growth and internal peace. On another give, their teachings may donate to a culture of spiritual skipping, where persons use religious concepts to prevent working with personal and cultural issues. This will cause a form of escapism, where the concentrate on religious attitudes distracts from the requisite of interesting with and handling real-world challenges.

Moreover, the professional accomplishment of ACIM and its related materials raises moral concerns. The expansion of workshops, publications, and seminars predicated on ACIM is visible as capitalizing on individuals' spiritual needs and vulnerabilities. Authorities fight that the commercialization of spirituality may result in the exploitation of seekers, who may spend significant time and money into practices that finally don't offer on their promises. This commercialization also can contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous interpretations and changes proliferate, potentially leading to frustration and misapplication of the principles.

Still another critical element to consider is the exclusivity and dogmatism that will sometimes accompany the ACIM community. While the class it self promotes general love and forgiveness, the way it's taught and used by some adherents may lead to a sense of spiritual elitism. This can build an "us versus them" mindset, wherever those that follow ACIM are seen as enlightened, while people who do not are seen as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes may be divisive and counterproductive to the course's proposed goals of peace and unity. Critics fight that true spiritual development must foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to making a hierarchical variance involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.