A "program in wonders is false" is just a bold assertion that needs a strong jump to the statements, philosophy, and impact of A Program in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study program compiled by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, comes up as a spiritual text that aims to simply help individuals obtain internal peace and spiritual change through some instructions and a comprehensive philosophical framework. Authorities argue that ACIM's base, practices, and results are problematic and ultimately untrue. That critique often revolves about a few important factors: the doubtful roots and authorship of the writing, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the psychological implications of its teachings, and the entire effectiveness of its practices.

The roots of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a medical and research psychiatrist, david hoffmeister said that the text was dictated to her by an interior voice she discovered as Jesus Christ. That claim is met with skepticism as it lacks scientific evidence and depends greatly on Schucman's particular knowledge and subjective interpretation. Experts fight this undermines the standing of ACIM, since it is difficult to substantiate the maintain of divine dictation. Moreover, Schucman's professional history in psychology might have inspired this content of ACIM, mixing emotional concepts with religious ideas in ways that some find questionable. The reliance on a single individual's experience improves problems about the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is founded on a mixture of Christian terminology and Western mysticism, presenting a worldview that some disagree is internally sporadic and contradictory to traditional spiritual doctrines. For instance, ACIM posits that the material earth is definitely an illusion and that correct reality is purely spiritual. That view can conflict with the empirical and reasonable strategies of Western philosophy, which emphasize the significance of the substance world and individual experience. Additionally, ACIM's reinterpretation of conventional Religious methods, such as sin and forgiveness, is seen as distorting core Religious teachings. Critics disagree that this syncretism leads to a dilution and misrepresentation of recognized spiritual beliefs, probably major readers astray from more defined and traditionally seated spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM can be problematic. The course encourages a questionnaire of refusal of the product world and personal knowledge, selling the indisputable fact that people should transcend their physical living and emphasis solely on religious realities. This perspective may cause an application of cognitive dissonance, where individuals battle to reconcile their lived activities with the teachings of ACIM. Experts argue this may result in emotional hardship, as people may possibly sense pressured to neglect their thoughts, feelings, and bodily sounds and only an abstract religious ideal. Additionally, ACIM's focus on the illusory nature of enduring can be seen as dismissive of real individual struggles and hardships, perhaps minimizing the significance of handling real-world issues and injustices.