In theory, Psyonix may bring about a revival in the cosmetic market, which in turn will allow consumers to dry through unfair and potentially illegal business practices. In other words, next year when your favorite YouTuber is on the Rocket League website, you'll see the stakes on the site. So what does Psyonix need to do to ensure that their trading market does not become the next breeding ground for predatory behaviour? Although choosing to exit the system is a good feature of this patch, it is definitely not an answer to shifting the game out of the economy. Of course, it's great to provide players with the option of not receiving new crate notifications, but that doesn't completely eliminate them Rocket League Items. In fact, the crates are still there, and a player can still buy the key to the economy.

I did not opt out of the system and I can see three options: It can take defensive measures to completely close any third party on the first day, or to encourage and manage the game outside the economy. Defensive attitudes include the monitoring of transactions, but only the account is prohibited, without any legal action taken. This practice is now seen in the Electronic Arts world, especially in their sports projects, their ultimate Team model. After a "money-for-coins" deal on the internet, art has begun trading in games such as FIFA and banning players who use them. Theoretically, this requires a large amount of manpower or extremely sophisticated machines to filter transactions. The size of Psyonix's staff is dwarfed by EA Sports, which may be wrong, such as asymmetric trading being overlooked or faulty trading being flagged, so this may not be the most popular option.