The sensible software of ACIM's teachings can be a place of contention. While some people report good transformations and particular growth from following the course, the others get the methods to be inadequate or even harmful. The course's increased exposure of forgiveness and enjoy is admirable, but critics disagree that it could be very simplified and naïve, failing to handle the difficulties of individual relationships and the need for boundaries and accountability. Additionally, the course's size and extensive nature can be frustrating for some individuals, ultimately causing burnout or disillusionment. Authorities suggest that the full time and energy needed to perform ACIM might be greater allocated to more empirically reinforced healing practices or religious professions which have an established track record of effectiveness.

The broader affect of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help towns can also be worth considering. The course has inspired a significant subsequent and has been built-into various New Era and religious movements. jesus gospel of love However, its impact can be seen as a double-edged sword. On one give, it's offered a construction for people seeking religious development and internal peace. On another give, its teachings can subscribe to a tradition of religious skipping, where individuals use religious concepts to prevent dealing with particular and social issues. This will lead to a form of escapism, where in fact the concentrate on spiritual attitudes distracts from the necessity of interesting with and handling real-world challenges.

More over, the commercial achievement of ACIM and their related products improves honest concerns. The growth of workshops, books, and seminars centered on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Experts fight that the commercialization of spirituality can result in the exploitation of seekers, who might spend significant time and income into methods that finally do not offer on the promises. That commercialization also can donate to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous understandings and changes proliferate, potentially ultimately causing distress and misapplication of the principles.

Still another important aspect to take into account is the exclusivity and dogmatism that could occasionally accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the class itself stimulates common love and forgiveness, just how it's taught and practiced by some adherents can lead to a feeling of spiritual elitism. This could develop an "people versus them" thinking, wherever those that follow ACIM are regarded as enlightened, while people who do not are viewed as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and detrimental to the course's purported goals of peace and unity. Critics fight that correct spiritual growth must foster inclusivity and humility, rather than making a hierarchical difference involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.