The practical software of ACIM's teachings can also be a place of contention. Though some people report good transformations and personal growth from following a program, the others find the techniques to be inadequate as well as harmful. The course's emphasis on forgiveness and love is excellent, but critics argue that it may be overly easy and naïve, declining to deal with the complexities of individual associations and the necessity for boundaries and accountability. Moreover, the course's period and extensive nature could be overwhelming for many people, resulting in burnout or disillusionment. Authorities declare that the time and energy expected to complete ACIM might be better allocated to more empirically reinforced healing techniques or religious professions which have a proven track record of effectiveness.

The broader impact of ACIM on the religious and self-help towns can be value considering. The class has encouraged a substantial following and has been integrated into numerous New Age and religious movements. But, their impact is seen as a double-edged sword. On a single hand, it's presented a structure for individuals seeking religious development and internal peace. On another give, its teachings may donate to a lifestyle of religious bypassing, where persons use religious ideas to avoid dealing with particular and cultural issues. This can result in an application of escapism, where the give attention to religious attitudes distracts from the requisite of engaging with and addressing real-world challenges.

Furthermore, the commercial accomplishment of ACIM and its related components raises honest concerns. The growth of workshops, books, and seminars centered on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' spiritual needs and vulnerabilities. Authorities argue that the commercialization of spirituality may cause acim audio the exploitation of seekers, who might invest significant time and money in to practices that finally don't deliver on the promises. This commercialization can also donate to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous interpretations and changes proliferate, possibly resulting in frustration and misapplication of the principles.

Still another critical part to take into account is the exclusivity and dogmatism that can occasionally accompany the ACIM community. As the program itself encourages universal enjoy and forgiveness, the way it's shown and practiced by some adherents can result in a sense of spiritual elitism. This will create an "us versus them" thinking, wherever those that follow ACIM are viewed as enlightened, while people who do not are viewed as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes could be divisive and counterproductive to the course's purported objectives of peace and unity. Critics argue that correct religious development must foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to developing a hierarchical variance between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.

The issue of whether ACIM is "true" eventually depends upon one's requirements for truth. From a medical perspective, the lack of empirical evidence supporting the states of divine dictation and the course's metaphysical assertions may be reasons for skepticism. From the philosophical standpoint, the internal inconsistencies and syncretism of ACIM can result in questions about their coherence and sensible validity. From a mental perception, the possibility of cognitive dissonance and mental stress improves issues concerning the course's effect on mental health. And from a functional point of view, the mixed results noted by practitioners and the possibility of commercialization and exploitation claim that ACIM's effectiveness and honest ranking are questionable.