The broader affect of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help towns can be value considering. The program has encouraged a significant following and has been built-into numerous New Era and religious movements. However, their impact is visible as a double-edged sword. Using one give, it's offered a structure for persons seeking spiritual development and internal peace. On the other hand, their teachings may contribute to a tradition of religious skipping, wherever people use religious concepts to prevent coping with particular and cultural issues. This will cause an application of escapism, where in actuality the give attention to spiritual beliefs distracts from the prerequisite of engaging with and addressing real-world challenges.

Furthermore, the industrial success of ACIM and their related materials improves honest acim concerns. The growth of workshops, books, and seminars based on ACIM is visible as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Authorities argue that the commercialization of spirituality can result in the exploitation of seekers, who may possibly invest substantial time and income in to methods that finally do not offer on their promises. This commercialization can also donate to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different understandings and adaptations proliferate, potentially resulting in distress and misapplication of the principles.

Still another critical part to think about is the exclusivity and dogmatism that will occasionally accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the program it self advances common enjoy and forgiveness, the way it is taught and used by some adherents can lead to an expression of religious elitism. This can produce an "people versus them" mindset, wherever people who follow ACIM are viewed as enlightened, while people who do not are seen as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and counterproductive to the course's supposed objectives of peace and unity. Critics fight that true religious development must foster inclusivity and humility, rather than developing a hierarchical distinction between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.

The question of whether ACIM is "true" ultimately is dependent upon one's requirements for truth. From a scientific perception, the possible lack of scientific evidence encouraging the statements of heavenly dictation and the course's metaphysical assertions may be reasons for skepticism. From the philosophical viewpoint, the inner inconsistencies and syncretism of ACIM may lead to questions about their coherence and rational validity. From the psychological perspective, the possibility of cognitive dissonance and mental distress raises problems concerning the course's impact on mental health. And from a practical point of view, the combined results reported by practitioners and the potential for commercialization and exploitation suggest that ACIM's effectiveness and honest ranking are questionable.