Members

Blog Posts

Swedish Skeptics Confirm "Nuclear Process" in Tiny four.7 KW Reactor





I spend plenty of my time debunking the free electricity fantasies of my much less technically capable buddies. Wishful questioning makes many trust that vehicles can run on water after seeing a short YouTube video. Lately, however, I have been undergoing an thrilling paradigm shift.

Remember the "cold fusion" fiasco of 1989? Well, I have come to recognise that it wasn't what it appeared at all. Denial, groupthink, dirty hints and without difficulty manipulated media combined to create an historic injustice. Two a long time have been wasted genuinely ignoring this recreation-converting discovery. Today's environmental failures, pricey electricity and oil wars may want to probably had been prevented. I'll say extra in a moment about what surely happened in 1989, however first, permit me let you know what were given me began reexamining what I thought I knew approximately cold fusion.

You in all likelihood think that 4700 watts of easy, radiation-unfastened power from a three cubic inch reactor Amar Equipment appears like but every other not possible hoax. But this become a third iteration demo, designed to satisfy skeptics of preceding demonstrations at the prestigious University of Bologna. Attending the third demo were two Swedish scientists. One changed into chairman of the Swedish Skeptics Society and the opposite become chairman of the Energy Committee of the Swedish Royal Academy of Science. They were both allowed to freely observe the whole setup except for the contents of the tiny, 50cc reactor chamber.

Their written record ended with: "Any chemical procedure for producing 25 kWh from any fuel in a 50 cm3 box may be dominated out. The best alternative explanation is that there is some kind of a nuclear manner that gives rise to the measured strength production." They also stated which you might ought to burn three liters of oil to produce 25 kWh. There has considering been another affirmation.

The inventor, Adrian Rossi, is very handy on his weblog and has said that a couple of hundred of his 4.4 kW reactors are strolling in four nations. He plans to ship a bigger unit in October that produces one MW of hot water. It includes loads of the small reactors in collection/parallel hooked up in a single 2 X three X 3 meter container. It weighs two heaps. The proprietary nanopowdered nickel gas might be replenished every six months. Everything has been financed the usage of Rossi's personal cash and the customer pays handiest while happy.

Rossi is an inventor and businessman who a long time ago noticed extra warmth effects while running with a nickel catalyst to synthesize gas from hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Using Edison-like experimental strategies, he quickly learned to manipulate the warmth production. He even saved his manufacturing facility heated for two years with a prototype reactor. More than thousand prototypes were built and destroyed in refining the layout and gaining knowledge of how to control and scale up the response.

Researching the science literature, Rossi soon located Dr Sergio Focardi of the University of Bologna, who had often published work on nickel-hydrogen reactors given that 1994. Using his very own cash, Rossi gotten smaller with Dr. Focardi and the college to assist him recognize and expand the technology as a product. By January 14, 2011 they had been prepared for a public demonstration of a ten kilowatt desktop reactor.

The press reaction changed into muted in Europe and nonexistent inside the U.S. Skeptics accused him of hiding a battery within the reactor so every other, longer, demonstration was held, the usage of calorimetry that heated but failed to boil water to answer different critics. The 18 hour demonstration produced 18 kilowatts common over the whole 18 hours. The U.S. Press became still silent and skeptics were still suspicious so two greater demos had been held.

Still, the silence from the U.S. Media became deafening. Rossi introduced that there could be no greater demonstrations till October 2011, whilst the million watt heating plant will be shipped to a purchaser in Greece. If he succeeds, be prepared for a repeat of the Sputnik shock of 1957 while america awoke to discover that that they had fallen way at the back of in technology.

Nickel is ample and cheap and so is hydrogen in the tiny quantities used. Nickel is so plentiful that power becomes virtually unfastened. Rossi's reactor is quite simple in precept. Powdered nickel and a catalyst are really heated to about six hundred ranges centigrade in a stainless steel chamber packed with pressurized hydrogen. At a sure point, the sluggish heating begins accelerating due to nuclear reactions inside the metal lattice. The heating resistor is subsidized off to hold the response going at a regular state, with about 15 times extra warmth output than input. Much better ratios are possible however can be unstable and perilous. This is why the 1-MW plant might be constructed using masses of smaller modules.

The reactor is enclosed in a lead defend due to the fact a few radiation is, unpredictably, produced during operation. However, the spent gasoline isn't always radioactive but includes copper that has transmuted from nickel within the nuclear reaction. The loss of risky radiation drives hot fusion specialists crazy, but without a doubt there are matters occurring that aren't blanketed through the equations utilized in hot fusion. Obviously, quantum mechanics wishes to be rethought to encompass those reactions.

There are many proposed theories. Biological methods were determined to producetransmuted isotopes without radiation. Also, tritium sometimes comes out of volcanic vents from unknown reactions inside the earth. Clearly, the physicists have extra to give an explanation for if they may just open their ears. Here is an equation they ought to look at carefully:

Groupthink + Denial = Environmental Disaster + Expensive Energy + Wars

Groupthink could make us totally irrational. The dot-com bubble and the housing bubble are examples of renowned professionals turning into absolutely blind to facts which can be now apparent in hindsight. Making quite a few money tends to blind us bad people to clean proof that we're dwelling in a delusion global. The consequences may be horrible.

Nuclear physicists in 1989 had been driving a bonanza of tens of billions in government studies money for the development of hot fusion reactors. After several decades of tough work, they were nevertheless far from achieving ruin-even, in which output energy exceeds enter strength. Just as the following round of appropriations become confident, Fleischmann and Pons came along with the assertion that they had already accomplished excess heat output without authorities support and on an cheaper laptop setup.

Denial turned into immediately. MIT and Caltech, who were leaders in hot fusion paintings, straight away went to paintings "attempting" to duplicate the test. In just five weeks Caltech introduced terrible results. At a May 1st 1989 APS assembly in Baltimore, two thousand physicists gave a status ovation to the Caltech group's presentation. A lynch mob mentality, combined with denial, turned the thrilling discovery of bloodless fusion into an enemy.

MIT helped set the tone by means of arranging a the front web page story inside the Boston Herald at the day of the meeting with the headline, "MIT bombshell knocks fusion "step forward" bloodless."The story became an interview with leaders of the MIT fusion lab that accused Fleischmann and Pons of fraud. The price became later denied but tapes of the actual interview verify what turned into stated.

MIT similarly disgraced itself by using changing records in its failure to replicate have a look at. This was discovered two years later via MIT worker Eugene Mallove, who determined copies of the July 10 and July thirteen drafts of the paper. The July 10th model had a graph that actually showed extra heat. In the July 13 model the graph was redrawn to expose no extra warmth. The environment at MIT, as proven via a "Wake for Cold Fusion" birthday celebration (before the statistics was analyzed) and t-shirts and mugs offered by the plasma fusion lab, turned into hardly ever independent.

To nowadays, denial reigns among maximum of the responsible events of this travesty. The Department of Energy, Nature mag, Scientific American, the American Physical Society, the U.S. Patent Office and a number of the international's pinnacle physicists nonetheless grasp irrationally to the belief that bloodless fusion is junk science. Of direction, this is how denial works: We defend our perception machine by way of quietly stepping around the "elephant beneath the rug." As long as a majority of our group backs us up, our view of reality stays grossly distorted to keep the group-suppose consensus. Global warming deniers try this every day.

The Fleischmann-Pons statement must have been the begin of a brand new technology of reasonably-priced, easy power that could have stored us from the financial and environmental screw ups and wars due to fossil gas energy. Instead, denial and grimy tricks brought on us to waste 23 years and tens of billions of bucks on failed nuclear initiatives as though nothing had happened. The Presidents 2012 finances consists of $2.5 billion for such initiatives. The first DEMO warm fusion plant is presently scheduled for 2033.

A sudden herbal technique changed into found in 1989 that can offer us with smooth, basically loose power. It sincerely conflicts with the current consensus knowledge of quantum mechanics that works nicely for decent fusion reactions. It seems reasonable to try to enhance the concept to deal with this new fact, but denial has as a substitute tricked many accurate scientists to try and "shoot the messenger."

The time has come to confess the mistake and get busy looking to enhance our know-how in order that we are able to perfect this exceptional new technology. We have spent $20 billion and fifty five years trying to reach destroy-despite warm fusion. Time to offer cold fusion a hazard.

There have been many painful medical battles within the beyond over paradigm changes, however fact has a way of prevailing in the end. Cold fusion paintings has persevered under the radar using the extra accurate term "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" (LENR.) Shunned by using the established order, supporters of LENR have created their personal journals and meetings. Muchprogress has been made.

The reasons for the preliminary trouble in replication of excess heat had been identified and the quantity of extra heat has extended. By 1995 there have been 21 published replications displaying extra warmness of as much as 205 watts. Strangely, the press lost hobby after the preliminary media circus. The media's face-saving denial has left the general public with the affect that bloodless fusion remains dead. In 2009, 60 Minutes broke the silence and did an superb update. But the relaxation of the media really overlooked it and centered rather on much less volatile reports on newsworthy objects like growing fuel prices.

Annual meetings have persisted. A weeklong operating demo of LENR was covered on the tenth ICCF convention, which changed into held in 2003 at MIT. The energy output turned into 2.3 instances the energy in. The most recent assembly changed into held in San Francisco in 2011 under the auspices of the American Chemical Society. The variety of presenters at this assembly have quadrupled considering the fact that 2007. The consequences this year have been so enthusiastic that the American Institute of Physics refused to submit the 370 page complaints. The cancellation of the book contract became a final minute choice, truely ordered with the aid of someone at a excessive level. This attempted blackout of a new technology will backfire in the long run as results get stronger and stronger.

By the use of nickel and ordinary hydrogen, numerous researchers have notably expanded energy output and reduced fees. In 1992, Thermacore, a U.S. Army contractor ran a mobile for almost a yr with a 50 Watt output and 3X extra electricity. In 1996 Dr. Sergio Focardi of the University of Bologna in Italy defined an test the use of nickel & hydrogen that produced a mean excess electricity output of 39 watts constantly for 278 days. There are a dozen competing theories to explain how nuclear reactions can produce so much strength without emitting risky radiation. Theories are useful but not vital. We nevertheless do not truly understand how permanent magnets paintings, yet we use them every day. Practical programs can be evolved experimentally, just as Edison developed the mild bulb.

Now that Rossi and Focardi have shown what may be executed, anticipate to look a flurry of new announcements. New technology have a tendency to take forever to totally debug, so it may not be surprising if the October transport is behind schedule. There are several other groups such asLattice Energy LLC, Blacklight Power, Brillouin Energy, and Energetics, who've introduced product plans to the clicking after which gone silent.

Views: 6

Comment

You need to be a member of On Feet Nation to add comments!

Join On Feet Nation

© 2024   Created by PH the vintage.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service