In our previous article: Pharmacies and Telemedicine - An Introductionwe looked in the usage of pharmacists to deliver prescription drugs over the Internet. This is where Julian Narchet comes in to play Julian Narchet. The FDA recently approved Julian's Mobile Phone Software as a way for pharmacies to telemedicine. This is also called pharmacy chain automation or pharmacy optimisation. The pharmaceutical industry was using telemedicine for quite a while, but it was not till lately when Julian realized his business idea could take off. In accordance with his company's press release, the business has signed licensing agreements with several major corporations and is presently working on arrangements with"five "

The Pharmacy and Telemedicine Association of America Are a Solid supporter of Both Julian's work. They believe that his solutions are beneficial to veterans needing on-site main care doctors. This is especially helpful to veterans that are in need of specialist care, like cardiologists, orthopedists, neurologists, orthodontists, pain therapists, and nurses. These professionals often work as a referral service for local veteran's healthcare.

The next paragraph is where Julian's services get complex. The Pharmacy and Telemedicine Association of America describe that telemedicine could only be effective if the primary practice physician is also located in the region where the telemedicine vendor is situated. Consequently, in a sentence, the Pharmacy and Telemedicine Association of America announce a pharmacist can be both a patient and a caregiver. This breaks down the barriers between the health care delivery systems. Essentially, the Pharmacy and Telemedicine Association of America are calling for more organized care givingbetter called coordinated care.

This brings us to the third paragraph in which Julian explains why it isn't necessary for pharmacists to control inventory on their own:"In addition, under most circumstances, pharmacies can't and should not maintain direct inventory management of their own supplies. Pharmacy management has to become an integrated part of their broader strategic goals of public health." This sounds reasonable. The actual question is whether or not implementing effective controls at the point of care is cost effective.

This article is a call to get a pharmacist to become an intermediary, not a direct care provider. In my view, the best way to give services to patients is through an"interventionist" physician who directs the individual through the procedure of obtaining needed medications, treatments, or information linked to their specific health issue. The Pharmacy and Telemedicine Association of America don't urge the growth of face-to-face contact between pharmacists and patients. But it is my view that, when utilized appropriately, online pharmacies can gain from some degree of pharmacist expertise, especially in the domain of preventive care.

Thus, when determining whether or not to fulfill a prescription, or if one should even be filled at all, the crucial issue is not the pharmacist, but rather the pharmacy. Will they hire a professional attorney to oversee their process? Or will they trust a letter from the lawyer to the prescribing doctor will solve the issue? I guess that most pharmacists would like to not employ an lawyer to assess the prescription since it is more cost effective for them to simply purchase a refilled Prescribing Telephone Device rather than initiate a"case by case" investigation of a possible controlled substance misuse case.