A "program in miracles is false" is really a strong assertion that needs a heavy jump to the statements, viewpoint, and impact of A Class in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study plan compiled by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that aims to greatly help persons obtain inner peace and religious change through a series of lessons and a comprehensive philosophical framework. Authorities fight that ACIM's basis, techniques, and results are problematic and finally untrue. That review often revolves around many essential points: the questionable beginnings and authorship of the text, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the mental implications of its teachings, and the general efficiency of their practices.

The sources of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a medical and study psychiatrist, stated that the text was formed to her by an inner voice she a course in miracles recognized as Jesus Christ. That state is achieved with doubt because it lacks scientific evidence and depends greatly on Schucman's personal knowledge and subjective interpretation. Critics disagree that undermines the standing of ACIM, since it is hard to substantiate the claim of divine dictation. Moreover, Schucman's qualified background in psychology could have inspired the content of ACIM, blending emotional ideas with religious a few ideas in ways that some discover questionable. The dependence on a single individual's knowledge improves concerns in regards to the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is founded on a blend of Religious terminology and Eastern mysticism, presenting a worldview that some fight is internally unpredictable and contradictory to old-fashioned spiritual doctrines. For instance, ACIM posits that the substance world is definitely an dream and that correct reality is purely spiritual. That view may struggle with the empirical and rational techniques of European idea, which highlight the significance of the material earth and individual experience. Moreover, ACIM's reinterpretation of traditional Christian ideas, such as for example sin and forgiveness, can be seen as distorting key Christian teachings. Critics disagree that this syncretism contributes to a dilution and misrepresentation of recognized spiritual beliefs, probably leading supporters astray from more coherent and traditionally seated spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM could be problematic. The program encourages a questionnaire of rejection of the material world and particular experience, selling the idea that persons must surpass their bodily living and target only on spiritual realities. That perspective may cause a form of cognitive dissonance, where people struggle to reconcile their lived activities with the teachings of ACIM. Critics disagree that this can result in mental hardship, as individuals may experience pressured to ignore their emotions, ideas, and bodily sensations in support of an abstract spiritual ideal. Additionally, ACIM's increased exposure of the illusory character of putting up with is visible as dismissive of real human problems and hardships, perhaps minimizing the significance of addressing real-world issues and injustices.