The realistic software of ACIM's teachings can also be a spot of contention. Though some persons report good transformations and personal growth from following the program, the others discover the methods to be ineffective or even harmful. The course's increased exposure of forgiveness and love is exceptional, but authorities argue that it could be overly simplistic and naïve, declining to handle the difficulties of individual associations and the need for boundaries and accountability. Also, the course's size and intensive character can be overwhelming for some individuals, resulting in burnout or disillusionment. Critics suggest that enough time and work required to perform ACIM might be greater used on more empirically supported therapeutic practices or spiritual professions that have an established history of effectiveness.

The broader influence of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help communities can also be worth considering. The program has influenced an important subsequent and has been integrated into numerous New Age and spiritual movements. But, their influence is seen as a double-edged david acim sword. On a single give, it's presented a framework for persons seeking spiritual growth and inner peace. On another hand, its teachings can donate to a lifestyle of religious skipping, wherever people use spiritual methods in order to avoid coping with personal and cultural issues. This may cause a form of escapism, where in actuality the focus on spiritual attitudes distracts from the requisite of participating with and approaching real-world challenges.

Moreover, the industrial success of ACIM and their related products increases moral concerns. The proliferation of workshops, books, and seminars predicated on ACIM is visible as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Critics disagree that the commercialization of spirituality can result in the exploitation of seekers, who may spend significant time and income into practices that finally do not produce on their promises. That commercialization may also subscribe to the dilution of the course's teachings, as various interpretations and adaptations proliferate, probably leading to frustration and misapplication of the principles.

Another important element to take into account may be the exclusivity and dogmatism that can sometimes accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the program itself encourages general enjoy and forgiveness, the way it's taught and used by some adherents may lead to a sense of spiritual elitism. This can develop an "us versus them" thinking, where people who follow ACIM are regarded as enlightened, while those who do not are seen as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes may be divisive and counterproductive to the course's proposed targets of peace and unity. Experts disagree that correct religious development must foster inclusivity and humility, rather than developing a hierarchical difference between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.