A "class in miracles is false" is just a striking assertion that needs a heavy plunge to the states, philosophy, and affect of A Class in Wonders (ACIM). ACIM, a spiritual self-study program written by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that aims to greatly help persons achieve inner peace and spiritual transformation through a series of lessons and an extensive philosophical framework. Critics argue that ACIM's base, methods, and results are difficult and finally untrue. This critique often revolves about a few important factors: the questionable origins and authorship of the writing, the difficult philosophical underpinnings, the mental implications of their teachings, and the general usefulness of their practices.

The sources of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a scientific and study psychologist, said that the writing was formed to her by an inner acim audio voice she determined as Jesus Christ. This maintain is met with skepticism as it lacks scientific evidence and relies seriously on Schucman's personal knowledge and subjective interpretation. Critics argue that this undermines the standing of ACIM, since it is difficult to substantiate the declare of divine dictation. Moreover, Schucman's professional history in psychology could have affected the content of ACIM, blending psychological concepts with religious ideas in a way that some discover questionable. The reliance about the same individual's knowledge raises problems about the objectivity and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is dependant on a blend of Christian terminology and Western mysticism, introducing a worldview that some argue is internally unpredictable and contradictory to traditional spiritual doctrines. For example, ACIM posits that the substance world can be an dream and that true the reality is solely spiritual. This view may conflict with the scientific and sensible approaches of Western viewpoint, which stress the importance of the material earth and human experience. More over, ACIM's reinterpretation of old-fashioned Christian ideas, such as sin and forgiveness, is seen as distorting key Christian teachings. Critics argue this syncretism results in a dilution and misrepresentation of established spiritual values, potentially primary fans astray from more coherent and historically seated religious paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM may be problematic. The program encourages an application of refusal of the product earth and particular knowledge, promoting the idea that people should transcend their bodily living and focus only on spiritual realities. This perception may result in an application of cognitive dissonance, where persons struggle to reconcile their lived activities with the teachings of ACIM. Critics disagree this can result in emotional hardship, as people may possibly feel pressured to dismiss their thoughts, ideas, and bodily sensations and only an abstract religious ideal. Also, ACIM's increased exposure of the illusory character of putting up with is seen as dismissive of authentic human problems and hardships, perhaps minimizing the significance of handling real-world issues and injustices.