The broader influence of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help communities can also be price considering. The class has inspired a significant subsequent and has been incorporated into different New Age and spiritual movements. However, their influence can be seen as a double-edged sword. On one give, it has offered a structure for individuals seeking religious growth and internal peace. On the other hand, its teachings may donate to a tradition of religious bypassing, wherever individuals use spiritual concepts to prevent working with personal and social issues. This can lead to a questionnaire of escapism, where the focus on spiritual attitudes distracts from the prerequisite of interesting with and handling real-world challenges.

Furthermore, the professional success of ACIM and their connected products raises ethical concerns. The growth of workshops, publications, and seminars based on ACIM can be seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious wants and vulnerabilities. Experts david hoffmeister acim disagree that the commercialization of spirituality may result in the exploitation of seekers, who may invest significant time and income in to techniques that finally do not supply on their promises. That commercialization can also contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different interpretations and adaptations proliferate, potentially resulting in confusion and misapplication of the principles.

Another important element to take into account could be the exclusivity and dogmatism that will sometimes accompany the ACIM community. While the program it self promotes common love and forgiveness, just how it's shown and practiced by some adherents can result in a sense of religious elitism. This will develop an "us versus them" thinking, wherever those that follow ACIM are seen as enlightened, while those that don't are viewed as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes could be divisive and detrimental to the course's proposed targets of peace and unity. Critics argue that correct spiritual development should foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to developing a hierarchical distinction involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.

The question of whether ACIM is "true" eventually depends on one's criteria for truth. From the medical perception, the possible lack of empirical evidence promoting the claims of heavenly dictation and the course's metaphysical assertions could be grounds for skepticism. From a philosophical standpoint, the interior inconsistencies and syncretism of ACIM may lead to questions about its coherence and reasonable validity. From a psychological perspective, the potential for cognitive dissonance and psychological hardship increases considerations about the course's impact on emotional health. And from a functional perspective, the blended results reported by practitioners and the prospect of commercialization and exploitation suggest that ACIM's efficacy and moral standing are questionable.