A "class in miracles is false" is really a strong assertion that needs a deep plunge in to the states, philosophy, and affect of A Program in Wonders (ACIM). ACIM, a spiritual self-study plan published by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that seeks to help people achieve inner peace and spiritual transformation through a series of instructions and a thorough philosophical framework. Critics fight that ACIM's basis, practices, and results are difficult and ultimately untrue. That review usually revolves about many essential points: the doubtful beginnings and authorship of the text, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the psychological implications of their teachings, and the overall usefulness of its practices.

The sources of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a scientific and research acim psychologist, said that the text was dictated to her by an inner style she determined as Jesus Christ. This claim is achieved with skepticism as it lacks scientific evidence and depends heavily on Schucman's personal knowledge and subjective interpretation. Experts disagree this undermines the reliability of ACIM, because it is difficult to substantiate the claim of heavenly dictation. Furthermore, Schucman's qualified background in psychology could have influenced the content of ACIM, mixing mental concepts with religious ideas in a way that some discover questionable. The dependence about the same individual's knowledge improves problems about the objectivity and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is based on a mixture of Religious terminology and Eastern mysticism, delivering a worldview that some disagree is internally unpredictable and contradictory to standard spiritual doctrines. As an example, ACIM posits that the product world can be an impression and that true reality is strictly spiritual. This view can conflict with the scientific and realistic strategies of Western philosophy, which emphasize the significance of the product world and human experience. Additionally, ACIM's reinterpretation of conventional Christian methods, such as for instance failure and forgiveness, can be seen as distorting primary Religious teachings. Critics disagree this syncretism leads to a dilution and misrepresentation of recognized spiritual beliefs, potentially leading supporters astray from more coherent and historically grounded spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM may be problematic. The program encourages an application of refusal of the product earth and personal knowledge, marketing the indisputable fact that individuals should transcend their bodily existence and focus solely on religious realities. This perception can lead to a questionnaire of cognitive dissonance, where persons battle to reconcile their existed experiences with the teachings of ACIM. Authorities disagree this may result in mental distress, as individuals might experience pressured to ignore their feelings, ideas, and physical sensations in support of an abstract religious ideal. Also, ACIM's increased exposure of the illusory character of putting up with is seen as dismissive of true human struggles and hardships, perhaps reducing the importance of approaching real-world problems and injustices.