The US-JO FTA allows entry of nationals of one celebration in the property of the other. From the start, it's required to tell apart between migration and the power of Jordanians to enter to the U.S. to create investments and take part in trade. Jordanian nationals are prohibited lasting resident status, but are only provided the opportunity to obtain a visa on a temporary base or "non-immigrant" status. That status involves that the visa beneficiary go back to Jordan after his temporary keep expires.

The US-JO FTA enables nationals of Jordan to enter into the U.S. to transport entirely "significant trade", including industry in solutions and technology. The yardstick in the FTA is "significant trade" ;.Article 8 doesn't establish what constitutes "substantial trade" ;.As an example, must a Jordanian trader be significant exporter to the U.S to be eligible for entry? Or the U.S is obliged, subject to its regulations on entry, to permit Jordan's traders access into their area for participating a deal good or partnering with U.S firms.

In influence, the language of report 8 of the US-JO FTA is drawn from the Immigration and Naturalization Company (INS), today known as Office of Citizenship and Immigration Service within the Division of Homeland Security, and the U.S Office of State regulations. The W8BEN of State regulations define a treaty trader as an alien, classifiable as a nonimmigrant treaty trader (E-1), who is going to be in the U.S exclusively to keep on trade of a "significant nature" either on the alien's behalf or as a worker of a international individual or organization employed in trade, "principally" between the U.S and the foreign state of which the strange is just a national.

That language is identical to the language of report 8.1 of the US-JO FTA. The rules of the Team of State reads that consideration being fond of any problems in the country of which the alien is really a national which can influence the alien's ability to continue such significant trade. Moreover, the alien should prove that he expects to depart the U.S after the firing of E-1 status.

While US-JO FTA does not define the word "considerable trade", the Department of State regulations establish it as the quantum of trade "sufficient" to ensure a constant flow of business objects involving the U.S and the treaty country. Continuous movement contemplates numerous exchanges over time rather than simple transaction, regardless of the monetary value. The U.S regulation thinks monetary value as an important factor. Nevertheless, greater weight is fond of more numerous exchanges of greater value. Thus, Division of State rules don't establish a defined monetary value of considerable trade, like $100,000, as a benchmark that would qualify a Jordanian trader as entitled to E-1 visa.

Somewhat, Team of State regulations keep it to the U.S Consular Company in Jordan the flexibleness of determining "substantial trade" that could qualify Jordanian nationals of for E-1 visa. This realization is reinforced by the truth that the regulations of the Division of State itself read that concern being fond of any situations in the country of that your strange is a national that might affect the alien's capability to continue such significant trade. In other words, the U.S Consular Office will need to take into consideration the situations predominant in Jordan when assessing a petition for E-1 visa. Thus, the term "substantial deal is going to be considered on a case-by-case basis.