Edward Said's signature performance, the theory of "Orientalism", has been celebrated as post-colonial propaganda wherever 'ethnic strength' is available to be a crucial part of relating the West's ideology concerning the East. Both West and the East, within their statement of the fact of 'ethnic strength', have their particular means of defining and applying it though occasionally in a selfish and autocratic way just like the West and occasionally in a servile and spontaneous way as that of the East. In our process of dissecting along with supporting the stated topic, we shall be wanting to determine 'ethnic strength' and their significance from the sides of both West and the East.

Defining 'ethnic strength' may admit the thought of a nation's stimulus for establishing their ethnic personality through numerous means and ways like an ethnic imposition. In establishing their tradition, a nation may assert their spontaneous flourishment without dominating other countries or it may maintain the path undermining or caricaturing other countries to brilliant their superiority around them. And the latter occurs in the case of the Westerners that are generally concerned because of their authority on the Easterners for their particular identity. The ethnic examination of the West and the East by Claimed in his "Orientalism" reveals the multifarious program and statement of 'ethnic strength';.Regarding this Claimed asserts, "ethnic energy is not a thing we can examine very easily- and one of the applications of the current performance is always to demonstrate, analyze, and reflect upon Orientalism as a workout of ethnic strength".

To the West, orientalism is their 'ethnic strength' that manifests itself through making dominant differences from the mean orient. Claimed observes, "European tradition acquired in energy and personality by placing itself down from the orient as a sort of surrogate and also underground self...".The occident methods their 'ethnic strength' through their atrocity of defining and providing shape to the orient who will never talk for themselves while the West thinks: "they cannot represent themselves; they should be spoken for".

The tradition of the occident reveals their energy through their imposition upon the visitors or the East. They are bothered about injecting their tradition into the mental performance of the orientals and also the orientals are made to believe within their way. This is the very energy theatus-culture.com of the tradition, though negative, they determine others on the foundation of the tradition as Claimed explains it through his theory of Orientalism: "Orientalism is better appreciated as a couple of constraints upon and limits of believed than it is simply as an optimistic doctrine." ;.that is orientalism that in this manner assures the respected practice of 'ethnic strength' of occident around orient.

The Westerners have a powerful interference of the tradition when they try to determine along with recognizing the orient being in addition to the orient. Their tradition of superiority complex and defining points selfishly allow them to delineate orient with a misunderstanding having outside thought as Claimed avows, "Orientalism is premised upon exteriority".The ethnic inclination to generalize a selfish thought about the complete orient from a single uncomfortable instance is solid enough proof their vehement energy derived from their culture. From a distant along with secure viewpoint, the West observes Persian cultures, though inappropriately, and ends them to be mean and bigotries cultures as their imaginary view of the orientals are: "The Persian is irrational, depraved(fallen), childlike, 'different'; ergo the European is logical, virtuous, mature, and 'normal'."

The strength of the tradition of the West is their belief that they're the absolute most sound these days culturally and this might be their fake ideology to avoid the fear of dropping authority or power. Their tradition endows them with the 'white man's burden' which they alleviate by schooling, punishing, rectifying, and finally civilizing the orient: "The orient was considered as though presented by the class, the criminal judge, the prison, the shown manual".This pervasive along with the mighty intrusion of the 'ethnic strength' of the West upon the East is subtly shown in Said's comment: "However what gave oriental's world their intelligibility and personality was not caused by their attempts but instead the complete complex series of knowledgeable manipulations by that the Orient was discovered by the West."

This is the purposively trivial examination of the East that gave the West the certificate to pull conclusions concerning the orient with their particular accord. This tradition of the cursory and rough examination of others through journey books and other similar sources allows them to believe the Persian as 'intense lion' wherever eventually the fierceness is outlined as opposed to the lion and ergo there's "no more elephants but their fierceness-".And also Arthur Wayne Balfour, an emissary for the Europeans, arbitrarily though ridiculously states occident's order around orient as he claims, "We realize the society of Egypt much better than we all know the society of any country".