The advantages of urban woods are numerous - from increasing the general standard of living for citizens, through mitigating severe weather situations such as strong winds, floods and hot weather, to lowering the effects of environment modify through carbon sequestration and storage Urban Treasures. Yet, despite all of the potential advantages, there is however a profound not enough an integral method toward administration of urban and peri-urban forests. FAO's aim is to remedy that by creating and introducing guidelines on urban forestry in September 2012, that may include a selection of good methods in addition to an summary of effective initiatives around the world.

Downtown forestry is just a fairly new control and therefore the rules for effective administration and preservation have not even been well defined. The roots of urban forestry might be followed back once again to North America, wherever in 1896 the first pine warden law was passed in Massachusetts, and one other five New Britain claims easily followed. Therefore, the US experience may be used as a starting point in developing a extensive global way of urban forestry management. In 1990, a special body, or the National Downtown and Community Forestry Advisory Council (NUCFAC), was established with the US Forest Company in order to promote a regular vision for urban forestry practices.

On one other side of the Atlantic, the European Union also requires some measures toward urban forestry development. The EU Forestry Strategy emphasises the significance of sustainable forestry administration (SFM), but, forest plan is to a large extent managed on a national stage because it falls within the sphere of competence of EU Member States. This also describes the region of urban forestry administration, wherever Member Claims have the power to determine how to apply procedures and how exactly to allocate financial methods for urban forestry projects.

Yet, the necessity to promote sustainable urban forestry has been acknowledged on a residential district stage and in 2010, the European Commission presented its effort "European Natural Money", with the purpose of encouraging cities to cover more interest for their environmental growth and produce "role models" for different European cities to follow. This effort of the European Commission appears to reflect the necessity to stimulate regional authorities to improve the quantity of forestry opportunities intended for the improvement of setting within their respective urban areas. Improving of urban setting and standard of living is also reinforced with the assistance of the LIFE plan of the European Commission.

But, all of the EU initiatives and methods linked to urban forestry are relevant more or less on a voluntary foundation and integrated neighborhood plan is apparently missing on a European level. Based on the European Setting Agency's distribution "10 communications for 2010 Forest Ecosystems", around three areas of the people in the EEA place live in towns and objectives are that numbers will increase as much as 80% by 2020. This constitutes the requirement for more extensive measures fond of establishing European standards in your community of urban and peri-urban forestry.

Establishing of standards or guidelines in the area of urban forestry, regardless whether they'd take the proper execution of a common EU plan, or be relevant on an international degree, as envisaged by the FAO, is fairly a tough task. By default, urban forestry describes administration of more or less confined rooms and must consider many different conditions such as gentle and water present, poor earth quality, urban preparing, etc. Additionally there are national and cultural specifics to think about and they vary significantly from one place to another. Therefore, initiatives for creating public understanding concerning the significance of urban woods are very crucial in addition to encouraging authorities to program forestry opportunities within their budget when emphasizing the growth of urban and peri-urban areas.