More over, the language and structure of ACIM are often criticized to be excessively complex and esoteric. The course's thick and repeated prose could be complicated to know and read, resulting in frustration and misinterpretation among readers. That difficulty can produce a barrier to entry, which makes it hard for persons to fully interact with and take advantage of the course. Some authorities disagree that the complicated language is just a purposeful method to obscure the possible lack of substantive material and to produce an illusion of profundity. The difficulty in comprehending the product may also lead to a dependence on outside educators and interpreters, further perpetuating the commercialization and potential for exploitation within the ACIM community.

Additionally, the thought of forgiveness as presented in ACIM has been criticized to be excessively basic and perhaps dismissive of true harm and a course in miracles injustice. The class advocates for a form of forgiveness that involves recognizing the illusory nature of the perceived offense and letting go of grievances. While this approach may be helpful in marketing internal peace and lowering personal putting up with, it might not sufficiently address the difficulties of certain circumstances, such as for example abuse or systemic injustice. Critics argue that type of forgiveness can be seen as reducing the experiences of patients and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This may cause a form of spiritual skipping, where people use spiritual methods to prevent coping with unpleasant thoughts and hard realities.

The overall worldview shown by ACIM, which stresses the illusory character of the product earth and the confidence, can also be problematic. This perspective may result in a questionnaire of spiritual escapism, where persons disengage from the physical earth and its problems in favor of an idealized religious reality. While this can offer temporary comfort or perhaps a sense of transcendence, additionally it may cause a insufficient engagement with important areas of life, such as for instance associations, responsibilities, and social issues. Authorities disagree that this disengagement may be detrimental to equally the average person and culture, since it advances a form of passivity and neglect of real-world problems.

The exclusivity of ACIM is another place of contention. The class usually presents itself as an excellent religious path, implying that other spiritual or spiritual traditions are less legitimate or effective. This exclusivity may foster a feeling of religious elitism among adherents and create team as opposed to unity. In addition it restricts the potential for individuals to pull on a varied selection of religious methods and traditions inside their personal growth and healing. Experts argue a more inclusive and integrative approach to spirituality would be more beneficial and less divisive.