From a scientific perspective, astrology is generally considered to lack empirical evidence to support its validity as a predictive or explanatory system. Here are some key points from the Astrology's historical roots and cultural significance:

Lack of Scientific Basis: Astrology is not considered a science by the scientific community. It does not adhere to the principles of the scientific method, which involves empirical testing, reproducibility, and falsifiability.

Absence of Mechanism: Astrology lacks a known or plausible mechanism by which the positions and movements of celestial bodies could influence human behavior or personality traits. This is a fundamental challenge to its scientific credibility.

Inconsistent Results: Scientific studies that have attempted to find correlations between astrological factors (such as birth charts) and personality traits or life events have produced inconsistent and inconclusive results. These studies often fail to meet rigorous scientific standards.

Precession of the Equinoxes: One of the criticisms from astronomers is the precession of the equinoxes. Over time, the positions of the zodiac signs have shifted due to this astronomical phenomenon, rendering traditional astrological charts inaccurate by modern astronomical standards.

Barnum Effect: Critics argue that astrology often relies on vague and general statements that can apply to a wide range of individuals (a phenomenon known as the Barnum effect or the Forer effect). This can create the illusion of accuracy, but it lacks scientific validity.

Confirmation Bias: Believers in astrology may be more likely to notice and remember instances when astrological predictions appear accurate while ignoring or forgetting instances when they do not. This confirmation bias can reinforce belief in astrology.

Psychological Explanation: Some psychologists argue that astrology's perceived accuracy may be explained by psychological factors, such as the placebo effect or self-fulfilling prophecies. People may behave in ways that align with their astrological sign due to the belief itself.

Controlled Studies: Scientific studies that have sought to test the validity of astrology have typically failed to find statistically significant results that support its claims. Such studies often involve controlled conditions and larger sample sizes.

Astronomical Inaccuracies: Astrology relies on a geocentric model of the universe that has been largely debunked by modern astronomy. The astronomical positions and influences attributed to celestial bodies in astrology do not align with current scientific understanding.

In summary, astrology's validity is widely questioned by the scientific community due to its lack of empirical evidence, the absence of a known mechanism, and inconsistent results from research studies. While astrology may have cultural, historical, or personal significance for some individuals, it is not considered a science, and its claims are not supported by the scientific method as it is understood in contemporary scientific practice.